The first question was: "What did you think of the camerawork?
-Was it shaky or still?
- Was in focus our out of focus?"
With this question most of our participants commented on how there was a lack of camera shot variations. The participants said suggested that the video could have had more different types of shots rather than the noticeable use of occurring shots such as wide shots. One interviewee particularly commented on how she liked a shot in which a wind up toy came into focus as it came towards the camera. She thought that it was a creative shot. Looking back on our music video, we agree that the product did not have a wide variation of shots.
Our second question was: "What did you think of the editing?
- Were the cuts too fast or too slow
-Were the transitions suitable?
-Were the effects suitable?"
In their responses to this question all of our interviewees (bar one) said that cuts in the video were too long. They acknowledged the song of the video was not exactly a fast paced song but they still expected it to have a somewhat fast cut rate (we agree with this criticism as we too felt that the cuts in the video were too long at times). However, that said, the participants all agreed that the transitions implemented in the video (such as 'cross dissolve') and as well as the effects used (like 'soft focus') were suitable and effective.
The third question was: "What aspects of the video do you think we could have done better on?"
With this question the majority of the respondents replied that one aspect of the video that they would like to get improved would be the longevity of some or most scenes (such as the coloured greenscreen scenes). Participants felt that the scenes often took too long to move onto to the next scene. One participant commented on our frequent use of varied coloured greenscreens. The participant made it aware that the use of a variety of coloured greenscreens/backgrounds was too much and that we could have replaced some of those scenes with more narrative scenes (i.e. showing the male and female characters in the video arguing).
For our forth question, we asked this: "What do you think of the ideas we used in the video?"
-like the wind up toy scene and lemon scene
The participants thought that some of the ideas we implemented in the video were creative at best. One of these ideas was our frequent use of stop motion. Most participants commented how they liked the way stop motion was used to create the effect that inanimate objects were moving. Another idea which was liked was the lemon scene. Participants thought that the scene was comical as the female character in the scene behaved and utilised the lemons in a humorous manner.
The final question interviewees were asked is: "Overall, did you like the video?
-If so, why?
-If not, why?"
In their overall response to the video and the questions we asked them, the participants said that they enjoyed the video in general. However, there were some issues that some participants did not enjoy about the video.One of these issues was the long length of some scenes. Although they enjoyed the video, the participants noted that this issue stopped them from enjoying the video fully. Another issue that a participant specifically felt weakened their enjoyment of the video was the frequent use of coloured greenscreens/backgrounds. The participant suggested that we should have implemented more narrative scenes in the video to replace some of the coloured greenscreen scenes.
After reviewing the responses from our audience feedback we feel that our video was able to portray the theme of a relationship breakdown (to a primary target of 15-24 females) that we intended to portray. However, judging from other aspects of our feedback we also feel that the video was not as greatly crafted/edited as we had initially hoped (our frequent use of coloured greenscreen backgrounds and long length of some scenes were the main issues affecting the quality of our video).










